Repowering Federal Rural Economic Development: The PLACE-SELECT-RANGE Framework for Strategic Resource Allocation

Policy Challenge and Significance

The United States faces a critical inflection point as artificial intelligence transforms the economy. Without intervention, rural communities risk becoming "AI deserts"—unable to access the tools, skills, and strategic capacity needed to participate in the emerging economy. This compounds existing structural disadvantages created by federal funding formulas.

Over $2.8 trillion in annual federal spending uses population-based criteria that systematically disadvantage small communities due to fat-tailed population distributions. The 98th percentile "place" is 615 times larger than the median, meaning proportional allocation guarantees inequitable outcomes for most communities. Rural areas receive less absolute funding despite higher per-capita costs for infrastructure, service delivery, and economic development.

This statistical bias intersects with definitional chaos. Federal agencies define "rural" using thresholds from 2,500 to 50,000 population, creating a maze of conflicting eligibility. Communities waste scarce capacity navigating whether they qualify as rural under USDA criteria (10,000), SBA standards (50,000), or dozens of other program-specific definitions.

These failures—funding bias, definitional confusion, and now AI accessibility—threaten to accelerate rural decline. Unlike the digital divide, which required infrastructure investment, the AI divide demands new frameworks for strategic capacity. Without systemic reform, 60 million rural Americans face economic obsolescence as AI reshapes work, commerce, and opportunity.

Proposed Policy Solution

Implement the PLACE-SELECT-RANGE Framework to transform how $500+ billion in annual federal economic development resources are allocated. This evidence-based system replaces population-based distribution with strategic pattern matching that acknowledges rural complexity.

The Framework operates through three integrated layers:

PLACE (Pattern Library of Applied Community Ecosystems): Communities profile their assets, constraints, and affordances against proven development patterns. Rather than force-fitting into metropolitan models, PLACE identifies viable patterns like Main-Street Services Modernization, Specialty Manufacturing Commons, Care Economy Cooperatives, or Outdoor Recreation Hubs. Each pattern is documented with real-world exemplars, required assets, and success factors.

SELECT (Systems for Evaluating Local Economic Configurations & Trajectories): Communities prioritize among viable patterns using multi-criteria analysis including Feasibility, Asset Fit, Economic Multiplier, Resilience, Equity Impact, and Infrastructure Requirements. SELECT generates scored pathways showing how communities can sequence development—for example, progressing from Recreation Hub to Outfitters Cooperative to Year-Round Events Economy.

RANGE (Regional & Non-metro Growth Engines): Communities access detailed implementation playbooks for their selected pattern. Each "Engine" includes operational templates, staffing models, financing strategies, and performance metrics tailored for resource-constrained environments. The Industrial Commons Engine, for instance, provides blueprints for shared equipment facilities, quality systems, and supplier development programs proven in similar communities.

Federal programs would align with PLACE-SELECT-RANGE classifications. Communities complete PLACE assessment, use SELECT to identify optimal pathways, then access RANGE playbooks with pre-matched federal resources. This replaces today's fragmented search across dozens of agencies with integrated implementation support.

Technology enables deployment through AI-powered tools that guide communities through Profile → Prioritize → Perform sequence, automatically matching patterns with available federal programs and tracking outcomes by configuration.

Potential Implementation Pathway

Phase 1 (Months 1-3): Executive Action

• EDA Administrator directive establishing PLACE-SELECT-RANGE pilot
• Partner with Tech Hubs and CDFIs for implementation infrastructure
• Select 50 pilot communities representing diverse patterns
• Deploy AI eligibility navigator addressing definition chaos

Phase 2 (Months 4-9): Pattern Development

• Document 20 proven patterns from successful rural initiatives
• Create SELECT scoring tools with USDA Rural Development
• Develop 5 priority RANGE playbooks for immediate deployment
• Track pilot outcomes and pattern effectiveness

Phase 3 (Months 10-18): Federal Integration

• OMB guidance for pattern-based program alignment
• Congressional briefings on fat-tail correction benefits
• State partnership agreements for co-adoption
• Public release of full framework and tools

Expected Impact and Relevant Metrics

Realistic 5-year projections based on pilot community performance:

• 500 communities successfully implement matched patterns (10% of target population)
• $5 billion in better-targeted federal investment (2% of relevant programs)
• 50,000 jobs created/retained through improved program fit
• 30% reduction in application failures due to definition confusion
• 75% of participating communities report increased strategic capacity

Systemic improvements:

• Common eligibility framework across 10 major federal programs
• 50% reduction in time from assessment to funding
• Creation of learning network sharing pattern innovations
• Demonstrated ROI justifying congressional expansion

Brief bio and Relevant Experience

Chris Carnell: 15 years implementing economic development across 40+ rural communities. Secured $25+ million in state and federal grants with 90% success rate (versus 30% national average), generating $100 million documented economic impact in the Midwest. Former co-founder of Codefi and Executive Director of the Codefi Foundation on Rural Innovation, he led the scaling of programs from pilots to multi-state initiatives. Governor-appointed to Missouri's Computer Science Advisory Council. Recognized as national thought leader by Brookings Institution, Center on Rural Innovation, and National Science Foundation. He has worked with federal agencies such as EDA, USDA, SBA, DOL, and DRA.

This practitioner experience translates field-tested solutions into scalable federal policy.